Living tracker — updated as states move

ABA Medicaid Rule Changes by State

In 2026, the binding constraint on ABA clinics stopped being the reimbursement rate. It became the rule book. States are changing who may supervise, who may bill, and how often you must re-authorize — often while leaving the published rate untouched.

This page tracks those changes, with every date and requirement traced back to the statute, agency bulletin, or provider manual it came from. No vendor-blog numbers.

7 states tracked
Last verified July 18, 2026

What changed, state by state

Ordered by urgency: states with deadlines still ahead come first, then rules already in effect.

North Carolina

In effect

House Bill 696 became Session Law 2026-1, rewriting who may enroll, who may supervise, and how much of that supervision can happen over telehealth.

Effective

April 30, 2026

Public comment closes July 20, 2026

The draft rewrite of Clinical Coverage Policy 8F is in a shortened 10-day comment period that ends July 20, 2026. It still conflicts with the statute on reauthorization frequency, so provider comment is unusually consequential this round. Comments go to medicaid.public.comment@dhhs.nc.gov. Note that submissions may be treated as public record, and NC Medicaid states you may comment without providing identifying information.

What changed

  • Out-of-state BCBAs may no longer enroll as Medicaid providers

    New G.S. 108C-9(e) bars Board Certified Behavior Analysts and Qualified Autism Services Practitioner Supervisors from enrolling as out-of-state providers. Two limits are widely missed: this is an enrollment bar, not a practice or licensure ban, and it applies only to applications submitted on or after April 30, 2026 — it does not speak to analysts already enrolled. NC Medicaid also defines an out-of-state provider as one located more than 40 miles beyond the state border, so clinicians inside that 40-mile band are border providers and are not covered by this bar.

  • Telehealth supervision of code 97155 capped at 50%

    The statute limits supervisor observation and direction of a paraprofessional delivered by telehealth to no more than half of that supervisor's services for any single recipient. The draft policy maps this to CPT 97155 and sets the ceiling at 50% of billing per beneficiary — raised from the 20% figure in the earlier draft. The state may grant exceptions for documented medical necessity or access problems, explicitly including poor provider availability in rural and underserved areas.

  • Reauthorization frequency is unresolved between statute and draft policy

    For treatment plans exceeding 16 hours per week, the enacted statute requires the plan to be updated and reapproved monthly. The draft policy instead requires reauthorization at least every 90 calendar days — and then contradicts itself, restating the monthly requirement in a later section. Until the final policy publishes, plan against the monthly statutory language rather than the quarterly draft language.

  • In-person requirements added for assessment and paraprofessional services

    Supervisor assessments conducted by telehealth are not reimbursable. Paraprofessional services delivered by telehealth are barred outright, subject to the state's exception process. Caregiver training is the exception in the other direction — it may be delivered entirely by telehealth with no in-person component.

  • New supervision floors and service ratios

    At least 10% of paraprofessional services must involve supervisor observation and direction. Separately, supervisor services must fall between 10% and 20% of a beneficiary's total, measured over six months, and this ratio applies only to beneficiaries receiving more than 200 paraprofessional hours in that period. Exceeding 20% remains reimbursable with documented medical necessity.

  • Paraprofessional credentialing changed in both directions

    Paraprofessionals must hold RBT or ABAT certification after a 120-day grace period from date of hire, but are exempt from Medicaid credentialing itself.

  • Three-tier enforcement, escalating to billing suspension

    First and second findings of noncompliance draw recoupment. A third occurrence of noncompliance found to be material and systematic can suspend billing privileges for one to two years.

Who this hits

Clinics that built supervision capacity around remote BCBAs located more than 40 miles outside North Carolina, and any clinic running high-hour cases where a monthly-versus-quarterly reauthorization difference determines how many weeks per year are billable. Rural programs are the ones most likely to need the telehealth exception process. The state projects Medicaid spending on this service will reach roughly $1.14 billion in SFY2027, which began July 1, 2026 — that projection is the pressure behind these rules.

Indiana

In effect

Indiana paired a modest rate cut with the most restrictive coverage limits in the country: a lifetime hour cap, a telehealth ban across most codes, and an age cutoff that ends adult coverage entirely.

Effective

April 1, 2026

Adult coverage ends October 1, 2026

ABA is being restricted to EPSDT — beneficiaries under 21 — with adults cut off after October 1, 2026. Clinics serving adult clients in Indiana have roughly ten weeks to plan transitions of care.

What changed

  • 4,000-hour lifetime cap on comprehensive ABA

    Indiana imposed a lifetime cap of 4,000 hours on comprehensive ABA, tracked with a new UA modifier. A lifetime cap is structurally different from an annual limit — it is not restored by a new plan year, so long-tenured clients approach an absolute ceiling.

  • Coverage restricted to beneficiaries under 21

    ABA moves under EPSDT authority, with adult coverage ending after October 1, 2026.

  • Telehealth banned across most direct service codes

    Modifier 95 telehealth is no longer permitted for codes 97151, 97152, 97153, 97154, or 0373T.

  • Roughly 6% rate cut now, with a further cut scheduled for 2027

    Effective for dates of service on or after April 1, 2026: code 97153 (U1) fell from $17.06 to $16.04, and 97155 at the U3 masters/doctoral tier fell from $27.63 to $25.97. The 97155 U2 tier fell from $21.85 to $20.54. A further reduction is already scheduled for April 1, 2027, taking 97153 to $15.39 and 97155 U3 to $24.93.

  • Group codes restratified by group size

    Group service rates were restratified by the number of participants, with code 97154 rising to $9.21 for groups of two.

Who this hits

Every Indiana clinic, but unevenly. Programs serving adults lose that population outright in October. Programs with long-tenured comprehensive clients face a hard lifetime ceiling that arrives without warning unless hours are tracked cumulatively from the start. And clinics that built assessment or parent-training workflows around telehealth lose them across most codes at once.

South Carolina

In effect

SCDHHS replaced its Autism Spectrum Disorder Services Provider Manual, reshuffling which codes may be delivered by telehealth and barring reimbursement when the diagnosing and treating entities share ownership.

Effective

July 1, 2026

What changed

  • Reimbursement barred when diagnosis and treatment share an owner

    The June bulletin prohibits reimbursement for ABA services provided by a clinic or agency owned by a private entity related to the same private entity that conducted the member's autism evaluation and diagnosis. This is the most operationally significant change in the rewrite and the one least covered elsewhere — it directly affects vertically integrated practices that both diagnose and treat.

  • Telehealth eligibility redrawn by code

    Code 97156 becomes permanently telehealth-eligible without prior authorization. Code 97155 becomes permanently telehealth-eligible but requires prior authorization. Code 97151 is no longer allowable by telehealth at all.

  • Authorization timing determines which rules apply

    Authorizations approved before July 1, 2026 continue under the prior policy. Any initial or continuing authorization submitted on or after July 1, 2026 must comply with the updated manual.

  • Tightened medical necessity, documentation, and enrollment standards

    The rewrite strengthens medical necessity criteria, expands the list of non-covered services, updates provider qualification and enrollment requirements, and adds documentation and plan-of-care requirements.

  • Rates are an open question, not a settled one

    Secondary write-ups state the rate structure is unchanged. SCDHHS did not say that. The May bulletin says the updated manual would be posted by July 1, 2026 with corresponding fee schedule updates to follow — an open item. We have found no primary source establishing rates as unchanged and are not repeating the claim.

Who this hits

Vertically integrated clinics that both diagnose and treat are the ones facing a structural problem rather than a paperwork one — under common ownership, the treatment side is not reimbursable. Everyone else should be checking whether pending authorizations were submitted before or after July 1, since that single date determines which rulebook applies to the case.

Georgia

In effect

Georgia DCH named ABA a high-risk service category in its fraud, waste, and abuse prevention program, and restricted remote supervision of RBTs by geography.

Effective

July 1, 2026

What changed

  • Remote RBT supervision restricted by distance

    Remote supervision of registered behavior technicians is permitted only by a provider located in Georgia, or within 50 miles of the state border. For clinics running centralized remote supervision from outside the region, this is the binding constraint.

  • Supervision ratios tied to claims accuracy

    Oversight ratios for RBTs are determined by the provider's claims accuracy, making billing performance a direct input into how much supervision capacity a clinic must staff.

  • Additional prior authorization requirements

    DCH proposed added prior authorization requirements for ABA as part of the same high-risk designation.

  • Capacity obligations for larger agencies

    Agencies above a certain size face capacity requirements to serve high-acuity members, plus an annual abandoned-care report to DCH. DCH also reiterated the prohibition on member solicitation.

  • Separately, CareSource cut Georgia ABA reimbursement to 80% of the fee schedule

    CareSource issued a notice of material amendment to Georgia network providers reducing ABA reimbursement to 80% of the then-current Georgia Medicaid fee schedule, effective May 11, 2026, with a 45-day objection window and termination 90 days after objection. This is a managed care contract action, not state policy, and the specifics come from a private contract letter rather than a published document — CareSource confirmed the substance on the record to trade press but has not published the amendment, the percentage, or the date. Treat the 20% figure as reported rather than official, and note it is Georgia-specific, not a national CareSource action.

  • What this is not: the CareSource medical policy being widely cited

    Several write-ups point to CareSource policy GA MCD-MM-0212, effective July 1, 2026, as the Georgia change. That document is a managed care organization's own medical policy, not state policy, and its revision history shows the underlying action was an annual review that moved payment detail into a separate policy and replaced copied manual text with cross-references. It is administrative cleanup. The DCH action above is the substantive change.

Who this hits

Multi-state clinics running remote BCBA supervision into Georgia from a hub outside the 50-mile band lose that model outright. Clinics with weaker claims accuracy face higher supervision staffing requirements than their competitors for identical caseloads, which turns billing quality into a direct labor cost.

New York

In effect

New York cut the technician-delivered rate specifically, in two steps, leaving every other ABA code untouched.

Effective

April 1, 2026

What changed

  • Code 97153 cut in two stages to $14.45 per unit

    Authorized by the enacted FY 2025-2026 state budget, the rate for 97153 fell to $16.85 per unit on October 1, 2025, then to $14.45 per unit on April 1, 2026 — a 14.2% reduction in the second step and roughly 25% cumulatively from the prior $19.26.

  • Only the technician code was reduced

    Codes 97151, 97152, 97155, and 97156 all remain at $19.26 per unit; group codes remain at $3.31 per unit per member. Characterizing this as an across-the-board New York ABA rate cut is inaccurate — it is a targeted cut to the code that carries the most volume.

Who this hits

Clinics whose revenue mix is weighted toward direct technician hours, which is most comprehensive programs. Because supervision and assessment codes were untouched, the cut compresses margin precisely where labor cost is least flexible.

Vermont

In effect

Vermont prohibited concurrent billing of supervision and direct service, on the grounds that both codes report the patient's time rather than the clinician's.

Effective

January 1, 2026

What changed

  • Codes 97153 and 97155 may no longer be billed concurrently

    Effective for dates of service beginning January 1, 2026, DVHA prohibits billing 97153 and 97155 for the same patient at the same time. The state grounds this in a June 2024 AMA clarification that these codes report the patient's face-to-face time, not the clinician's, and estimates concurrent billing had inflated tier hours by approximately 12%.

  • Tier rates absorbed the previously withheld value-based payment amount

    Tier hourly rates now include the 1% previously withheld for Value Based Payment.

  • ABA determined to fall outside Vermont's supervised billing rules

    DVHA separately determined that ABA does not fall under Vermont's supervised billing rules at all.

Who this hits

Programs that staffed supervision on the assumption it could be billed alongside direct service during the same session. The state's own estimate of a 12% inflation in tier hours is, read from the other direction, an estimate of the revenue those programs lose.

Alabama

Paused

A new pediatrician specialty-designation requirement for valid ABA referrals was announced, then paused three days later and has not been reinstated.

Effective

No date set

Paused, with no replacement guidance issued

Alabama Medicaid paused the July 1, 2026 implementation on June 18, 2026 and said it would issue additional guidance. As of our last check on July 18, 2026, no subsequent ABA alert has been published. The pause did not suspend any existing billing rules. Questions go to appliedbehavioranalysis@medicaid.alabama.gov.

What changed

  • Pediatricians would need an added specialty designation for referrals to be valid

    The paused rule would require physicians enrolled as Provider Type 31 with Specialty 345 to submit a written request on official letterhead to add ABA Specialty 175 to their enrollment. Without that designation, the autism diagnosis would not be valid for an ABA therapy referral and referrals would be denied.

  • No retroactive effect

    The agency stated there is no retroactive date for adding ABA Specialty 175 — the effective date would be the date the specialty is approved and added to the provider's enrollment file. For clinics, that means referral pipelines could not be repaired after the fact.

  • CRNPs cannot diagnose for ABA referral purposes

    The same alert stated that certified registered nurse practitioners are not authorized to diagnose autism-related conditions for ABA referrals. This point was not part of the paused implementation and was not widely reported.

Who this hits

Alabama clinics that depend on pediatrician referrals — which is most of them. The risk here is timing rather than substance: because the designation cannot be applied retroactively, a reinstatement with a short runway would invalidate referrals from any pediatrician who had not already filed. Worth tracking referral sources' enrollment status now rather than when guidance lands.

How we source this page

Most of what circulates about ABA Medicaid rule changes comes from vendor blogs restating each other, and the errors compound. Everything here follows two rules.

Primary sources only

Every date and requirement links to the statute, agency bulletin, provider manual, or published fee schedule. Trade press appears only alongside a primary source, never as the sole citation for a number.

Unverified claims are omitted

If a figure exists only in vendor marketing content and cannot be traced to a state source, it does not appear on this page — even when it is widely repeated.

This is not legal or billing advice. Rules change between our verification dates, and state agencies issue clarifications that alter how a policy is applied in practice. Confirm anything operational against your state's current provider manual and your own payer contracts before acting on it. Found something out of date? Tell us and we will correct it.

Questions clinic owners ask

Why are so many states changing ABA Medicaid rules at once?

Two pressures arrived together. State Medicaid ABA spending grew sharply over the last five years, and a federal OIG audit series found documentation and credentialing problems in every state it sampled. States are responding with tighter authorization, supervision, and credentialing rules rather than across-the-board rate cuts, because rule changes reduce spend without a public rate fight.

Do these changes affect commercial insurance too?

Not directly. Everything on this page is Medicaid policy. But commercial payers watch state Medicaid rules closely, and supervision ratios and telehealth limits adopted by a state Medicaid program often show up in commercial medical policy within a year or two.

How often is this page updated?

We check the listed states against their primary sources on a rolling basis and add new states as changes are published. Each entry shows its own last-verified date so you can see exactly how current that specific state is.

What should a clinic do when a rule change is announced?

Model the staffing impact first, because credentialing and supervision rules change who can bill before they change what you are paid. Then look at authorization timing, since reauthorization gaps create unbillable weeks. Marketing matters last, but it matters: when a rule shrinks your billable capacity, intake volume and payer mix become the levers you still control.

A rule change is a volume problem

When a state shrinks who can bill or how often you can authorize, the levers you still control are intake volume and payer mix. We will look at where your families come from and what it would take to replace the capacity a rule change costs you.

No commitment. You will see the most impactful fixes first.