Living tracker, updated as states move

ABA Medicaid Rule Changes by State

In 2026, the binding constraint on ABA clinics stopped being the reimbursement rate. It became the rule book. States are changing who may supervise, who may bill, and how often you must re-authorize and they often leave the published rate untouched.

This page tracks those changes, with every date and requirement traced back to the statute, agency bulletin, or provider manual it came from. No vendor-blog numbers.

7 states tracked
Last verified October 16, 2026

What changed, state by state

Ordered by urgency: states with deadlines still ahead come first, then rules already in effect.

New York

In effect

New York has now cut the technician-delivered rate three times in twelve months, to $9.63 per unit, while leaving every other ABA code untouched.

Effective

October 1, 2026

Third cut took effect October 1, 2026

Code 97153 is now $9.63 per unit in fee-for-service, which is $38.52 for an hour of technician-delivered therapy. That is half what the same hour paid in September 2025. The notice covers fee-for-service only and says nothing about managed care rates, so clinics with a mixed payer book need to price the two separately rather than assuming the cut flows through everywhere.

What changed

  • Code 97153 cut in three stages, from $19.26 to $9.63 per unit

    The first two steps came from the enacted FY 2025-2026 budget: $19.26 to $16.85 per unit on October 1, 2025, then to $14.45 on April 1, 2026. The third came from the enacted FY 2026-2027 budget and took the rate to $9.63 on October 1, 2026. Cumulatively that is a 50% reduction in twelve months. In hourly terms, four units of technician time fell from $77.04 to $38.52.

  • Only the technician code was reduced, all three times

    Codes 97151, 97152, 97155, and 97156 remain at $19.26 per unit. Characterizing this as an across-the-board New York ABA rate cut is inaccurate. It is a targeted cut, repeated three times, to the single code that carries the most volume in a comprehensive program. The state's stated rationale is that the change "ensures providers of ABA services are compensated equitably for their training and experience," which reads as a deliberate decision to price unlicensed technician time well below licensed time.

  • The arithmetic now collides with technician wages

    At $38.52 per collected hour, a technician paid $25 an hour consumes 65% of the revenue that hour generates before payroll taxes, benefits, supervision time, unbilled cancellations, or any overhead. New York also has one of the highest technician-proxy wage medians in the country, which is why this rate is the one that providers describe as structurally unworkable rather than merely tight.

Who this hits

Clinics whose revenue mix is weighted toward direct technician hours, which is most comprehensive programs. Because supervision and assessment codes were untouched all three times, the cut compresses margin precisely where labor cost is least flexible. Fee-for-service panels take the hit first; managed care contracts are negotiated separately and the state notice does not speak to them.

Georgia

In effect

Georgia's managed care plans, not the state, are where ABA rates are being cut: Amerigroup took 30% off technician services for foster children, and CareSource moved its network to 80% of the fee schedule. DCH separately named ABA a high-risk service category.

Effective

September 1, 2026

Foster children's rates cut 30% on September 1, 2026

Amerigroup is the sole care management organization for Georgia's foster children, so these families cannot switch plans in response. Clinics reported that the notice arrived in August for a September 1 effective date, and that September remittances came back cut as described. If you serve this population, reconcile a September statement against your contracted rate before assuming the cut did not reach you.

What changed

  • Amerigroup cut technician-delivered ABA 30% for foster children

    Amerigroup, part of the Elevance family, reduced ABA reimbursement by 30% effective September 1, 2026 for the foster care population it covers under Georgia's Medicaid program. Its notice to clinics described the change as intended to better align reimbursement across autism services, and in an email to the state it said it would raise rates for caregiver-training work instead, calling the new structure a more targeted and clinically defensible approach. This is a managed care rate action, not a change to the state fee schedule, and Georgia sets no managed care rate floor for ABA. DCH's position is that where no in-network provider is available, Amerigroup must arrange out-of-network care case by case, which is a right families have to know to invoke.

  • Remote RBT supervision restricted by distance

    Remote supervision of registered behavior technicians is permitted only by a provider located in Georgia, or within 50 miles of the state border. For clinics running centralized remote supervision from outside the region, this is the binding constraint.

  • Supervision ratios tied to claims accuracy

    Oversight ratios for RBTs are determined by the provider's claims accuracy, making billing performance a direct input into how much supervision capacity a clinic must staff.

  • Additional prior authorization requirements

    DCH proposed added prior authorization requirements for ABA as part of the same high-risk designation.

  • Capacity obligations for larger agencies

    Agencies above a certain size face capacity requirements to serve high-acuity members, plus an annual abandoned-care report to DCH. DCH also reiterated the prohibition on member solicitation.

  • Separately, CareSource cut Georgia ABA reimbursement to 80% of the fee schedule

    CareSource issued a notice of material amendment to Georgia network providers reducing ABA reimbursement to 80% of the then-current Georgia Medicaid fee schedule, effective May 11, 2026, with a 45-day objection window and termination 90 days after objection. This is a managed care contract action, not state policy, and the specifics come from a private contract letter rather than a published document: CareSource confirmed the substance on the record to trade press but has not published the amendment, the percentage, or the date. Treat the 20% figure as reported rather than official, and note it is Georgia-specific, not a national CareSource action.

  • What this is not: the CareSource medical policy being widely cited

    Several write-ups point to CareSource policy GA MCD-MM-0212, effective July 1, 2026, as the Georgia change. That document is a managed care organization's own medical policy, not state policy, and its revision history shows the underlying action was an annual review that moved payment detail into a separate policy and replaced copied manual text with cross-references. It is administrative cleanup. The DCH action above is the substantive change.

Who this hits

Clinics serving foster children take the sharpest hit, and rural clinics that are the only provider in their area have no way to spread it. Multi-state clinics running remote BCBA supervision into Georgia from a hub outside the 50-mile band lose that model outright. Clinics with weaker claims accuracy face higher supervision staffing requirements than their competitors for identical caseloads, which turns billing quality into a direct labor cost. The pattern worth noting is that two of Georgia's three managed care plans have now cut ABA independently of the state, which means watching the fee schedule alone will not tell you what you are being paid.

North Carolina

In effect

House Bill 696 became Session Law 2026-1, and the Clinical Coverage Policy 8F rewrite implementing it is now final, rewriting who may enroll, who may supervise, and how much of that supervision can happen over telehealth.

Effective

August 1, 2026

The monthly-versus-quarterly reauthorization conflict is resolved: it is 90 days

Earlier drafts of Clinical Coverage Policy 8F contradicted the statute on how often high-hour treatment plans must be reauthorized, and this tracker previously advised planning against the stricter monthly reading. The final policy settles it. For plans exceeding 16 hours per week, reauthorization is required at least once every 90 calendar days, and the initial authorization period is also capped at 90 days. Plans at 16 hours or fewer run on a 180-calendar-day cycle. If you built a monthly reauthorization workflow on the draft language, you can stand it down.

What changed

  • Out-of-state BCBAs may no longer enroll as Medicaid providers

    New G.S. 108C-9(e) bars Board Certified Behavior Analysts and Qualified Autism Services Practitioner Supervisors from enrolling as out-of-state providers. Two limits are widely missed: this is an enrollment bar, not a practice or licensure ban, and it applies only to applications submitted on or after April 30, 2026. It does not speak to analysts already enrolled. NC Medicaid also defines an out-of-state provider as one located more than 40 miles beyond the state border, so clinicians inside that 40-mile band are border providers and are not covered by this bar. NC Medicaid has since dated the in-state enrollment requirement for supervisors and qualified professionals to August 2, 2026, citing Session Law 2026-1, Sec. 3C.18(c).

  • Telehealth supervision of code 97155 capped at 50% per 180-day period

    The statute limits supervisor observation and direction of a paraprofessional delivered by telehealth to no more than half of that supervisor's services for any single recipient. The final policy maps this to CPT 97155, billed with the GT modifier, and sets the ceiling at 50% of total 97155 billing per beneficiary per 180-calendar-day period. That denominator matters: it is a rolling-period ceiling, not a per-claim or per-month test. Exceeding it requires written clinical justification in the beneficiary's treatment plan. Telehealth may not be used solely for the convenience of the provider, the beneficiary, or the caregiver.

  • Reauthorization is every 90 days above 16 hours per week, every 180 days below it

    The final policy resolves a conflict that ran through every earlier draft. Treatment plans involving more than 16 hours of services per week must be reviewed, modified, and submitted for reauthorization at least once every 90 calendar days, and the initial authorization period for those plans is capped at the same 90 days. Plans involving 16 hours or fewer per week reauthorize at least once every 180 calendar days. Reauthorization must be submitted before the existing authorization expires, so the operational deadline is earlier than the expiration date itself.

  • Telehealth removed for paraprofessional services entirely

    Telehealth is removed as a delivery modality for paraprofessional services, which the policy identifies as CPT codes 97152, 97153, and 97154. Assessment delivered by telehealth under 97151 requires clinical justification in the treatment plan. Caregiver guidance runs the other way: 97156 and 97157 are offered by telephonic modality, billed with the KX modifier, when the policy's access criteria are met.

  • Supervisor-to-paraprofessional ratio of 10% to 20%, with a 200-hour trigger

    For beneficiaries receiving more than 200 hours of paraprofessional services in a 180-calendar-day period, supervisor-delivered services must fall between one hour per ten hours of service (10%) and two hours per ten (20%). The policy defines the arithmetic explicitly: supervisor hours billed over the period divided by paraprofessional hours billed over that same period, for that same beneficiary. The ratio must be documented in the treatment plan, and any plan requesting a ratio outside the band requires written clinical justification. Clinics below the 200-hour threshold are not subject to the ratio at all, but they are still subject to the separate observation requirement: observation for modification of intervention and technician direction must be provided on an ongoing basis throughout the time services are delivered, with the observing provider either in the same room or on telehealth within the policy's telehealth limits. Note that the earlier draft's flat 10% observation floor does not appear in the final policy as a standalone number.

  • Paraprofessionals must hold RBT or ABAT certification, with a grace period

    Qualifying certification means the BACB's Registered Behavior Technician credential or QABA's Applied Behavior Analysis Technician credential. New hires have 120 days from date of hire. Paraprofessionals already employed when the policy took effect have 120 days from August 1, 2026. Until the certification is in hand, the paraprofessional requires direct oversight by a licensed qualified autism services professional whenever they deliver services, which is a staffing cost, not a paperwork one.

  • Three-tier enforcement, escalating to billing suspension

    First and second findings of noncompliance draw recoupment. A third occurrence of noncompliance found to be material and systematic can suspend billing privileges for one to two years.

Who this hits

Clinics that built supervision capacity around remote BCBAs located more than 40 miles outside North Carolina, and any clinic running high-hour cases where a monthly-versus-quarterly reauthorization difference determines how many weeks per year are billable. Rural programs are the ones most likely to need the telehealth exception process. The state projects Medicaid spending on this service will reach roughly $1.14 billion in SFY2027, which began July 1, 2026. That projection is the pressure behind these rules.

Indiana

In effect

Indiana paired a modest rate cut with the most restrictive coverage limits in the country: a lifetime hour cap, a telehealth ban across most codes, and an age cutoff that ends adult coverage entirely.

Effective

April 1, 2026

Adult coverage ended October 1, 2026

The age cutoff has now passed. ABA is restricted to EPSDT, meaning beneficiaries under 21, and Indiana Medicaid coverage for members who turned 21 ended October 1, 2026. Clinics that served adult clients are past the transition window, not approaching it. The 4,000-hour lifetime cap is the live problem now: it does not reset with a plan year, so the clients closest to the ceiling are the ones to audit first.

What changed

  • 4,000-hour lifetime cap on comprehensive ABA

    Indiana imposed a lifetime cap of 4,000 hours on comprehensive ABA, tracked with a new UA modifier. A lifetime cap is structurally different from an annual limit. It is not restored by a new plan year, so long-tenured clients approach an absolute ceiling.

  • Coverage restricted to beneficiaries under 21

    ABA moved under EPSDT authority, and coverage for members turning 21 ended October 1, 2026. Indiana is the clearest example of a state using the EPSDT boundary itself as the cost control, rather than cutting the rate for everyone.

  • Telehealth banned across most direct service codes

    Modifier 95 telehealth is no longer permitted for codes 97151, 97152, 97153, 97154, or 0373T.

  • Roughly 6% rate cut now, with a further cut scheduled for 2027

    Effective for dates of service on or after April 1, 2026: code 97153 (U1) fell from $17.06 to $16.04, and 97155 at the U3 masters/doctoral tier fell from $27.63 to $25.97. The 97155 U2 tier fell from $21.85 to $20.54. A further reduction is already scheduled for April 1, 2027, taking 97153 to $15.39 and 97155 U3 to $24.93.

  • Group codes restratified by group size

    Group service rates were restratified by the number of participants, with code 97154 rising to $9.21 for groups of two.

Who this hits

Every Indiana clinic, but unevenly. Programs serving adults lose that population outright in October. Programs with long-tenured comprehensive clients face a hard lifetime ceiling that arrives without warning unless hours are tracked cumulatively from the start. And clinics that built assessment or parent-training workflows around telehealth lose them across most codes at once.

South Carolina

In effect

SCDHHS replaced its Autism Spectrum Disorder Services Provider Manual, reshuffling which codes may be delivered by telehealth and barring reimbursement when the diagnosing and treating entities share ownership.

Effective

July 1, 2026

What changed

  • Reimbursement barred when diagnosis and treatment share an owner

    The June bulletin prohibits reimbursement for ABA services provided by a clinic or agency owned by a private entity related to the same private entity that conducted the member's autism evaluation and diagnosis. This is the most operationally significant change in the rewrite and the one least covered elsewhere. It directly affects vertically integrated practices that both diagnose and treat.

  • Telehealth eligibility redrawn by code

    Code 97156 becomes permanently telehealth-eligible without prior authorization. Code 97155 becomes permanently telehealth-eligible but requires prior authorization. Code 97151 is no longer allowable by telehealth at all.

  • Authorization timing determines which rules apply

    Authorizations approved before July 1, 2026 continue under the prior policy. Any initial or continuing authorization submitted on or after July 1, 2026 must comply with the updated manual.

  • Tightened medical necessity, documentation, and enrollment standards

    The rewrite strengthens medical necessity criteria, expands the list of non-covered services, updates provider qualification and enrollment requirements, and adds documentation and plan-of-care requirements.

  • Rates are an open question, not a settled one

    Secondary write-ups state the rate structure is unchanged. SCDHHS did not say that. The May bulletin says the updated manual would be posted by July 1, 2026 with corresponding fee schedule updates to follow: an open item. We have found no primary source establishing rates as unchanged and are not repeating the claim.

Who this hits

Vertically integrated clinics that both diagnose and treat are the ones facing a structural problem rather than a paperwork one: under common ownership, the treatment side is not reimbursable. Everyone else should be checking whether pending authorizations were submitted before or after July 1, since that single date determines which rulebook applies to the case.

Vermont

In effect

Vermont prohibited concurrent billing of supervision and direct service, on the grounds that both codes report the patient's time rather than the clinician's.

Effective

January 1, 2026

What changed

  • Codes 97153 and 97155 may no longer be billed concurrently

    Effective for dates of service beginning January 1, 2026, DVHA prohibits billing 97153 and 97155 for the same patient at the same time. The state grounds this in a June 2024 AMA clarification that these codes report the patient's face-to-face time, not the clinician's, and estimates concurrent billing had inflated tier hours by approximately 12%.

  • Tier rates absorbed the previously withheld value-based payment amount

    Tier hourly rates now include the 1% previously withheld for Value Based Payment.

  • ABA determined to fall outside Vermont's supervised billing rules

    DVHA separately determined that ABA does not fall under Vermont's supervised billing rules at all.

Who this hits

Programs that staffed supervision on the assumption it could be billed alongside direct service during the same session. The state's own estimate of a 12% inflation in tier hours is, read from the other direction, an estimate of the revenue those programs lose.

Alabama

Paused

A new pediatrician specialty-designation requirement for valid ABA referrals was announced, then paused three days later and has not been reinstated.

Effective

No date set

Paused, with no replacement guidance issued

Alabama Medicaid paused the July 1, 2026 implementation on June 18, 2026 and said it would issue additional guidance. As of our last check on July 18, 2026, no subsequent ABA alert has been published. The pause did not suspend any existing billing rules. Questions go to appliedbehavioranalysis@medicaid.alabama.gov.

What changed

  • Pediatricians would need an added specialty designation for referrals to be valid

    The paused rule would require physicians enrolled as Provider Type 31 with Specialty 345 to submit a written request on official letterhead to add ABA Specialty 175 to their enrollment. Without that designation, the autism diagnosis would not be valid for an ABA therapy referral and referrals would be denied.

  • No retroactive effect

    The agency stated there is no retroactive date for adding ABA Specialty 175. The effective date would be the date the specialty is approved and added to the provider's enrollment file. For clinics, that means referral pipelines could not be repaired after the fact.

  • CRNPs cannot diagnose for ABA referral purposes

    The same alert stated that certified registered nurse practitioners are not authorized to diagnose autism-related conditions for ABA referrals. This point was not part of the paused implementation and was not widely reported.

Who this hits

Alabama clinics that depend on pediatrician referrals, which is most of them. The risk here is timing rather than substance: because the designation cannot be applied retroactively, a reinstatement with a short runway would invalidate referrals from any pediatrician who had not already filed. Worth tracking referral sources' enrollment status now rather than when guidance lands.

How we source this page

Most of what circulates about ABA Medicaid rule changes comes from vendor blogs restating each other, and the errors compound. Everything here follows two rules.

Primary sources only

Every date and requirement links to the statute, agency bulletin, provider manual, or published fee schedule. Trade press appears only alongside a primary source, never as the sole citation for a number.

Unverified claims are omitted

If a figure exists only in vendor marketing content and cannot be traced to a state source, it does not appear on this page, even when it is widely repeated.

This is not legal or billing advice. Rules change between our verification dates, and state agencies issue clarifications that alter how a policy is applied in practice. Confirm anything operational against your state's current provider manual and your own payer contracts before acting on it. Found something out of date? Tell us and we will correct it.

Questions clinic owners ask

Why are so many states changing ABA Medicaid rules at once?

Two pressures arrived together. State Medicaid ABA spending grew sharply over the last five years, and a federal OIG audit series found documentation and credentialing problems in every state it sampled. States are responding with tighter authorization, supervision, and credentialing rules rather than across-the-board rate cuts, because rule changes reduce spend without a public rate fight.

Do these changes affect commercial insurance too?

Not directly. Everything on this page is Medicaid policy. But commercial payers watch state Medicaid rules closely, and supervision ratios and telehealth limits adopted by a state Medicaid program often show up in commercial medical policy within a year or two.

How often is this page updated?

We check the listed states against their primary sources on a rolling basis and add new states as changes are published. Each entry shows its own last-verified date so you can see exactly how current that specific state is.

What should a clinic do when a rule change is announced?

Model the staffing impact first, because credentialing and supervision rules change who can bill before they change what you are paid. Then look at authorization timing, since reauthorization gaps create unbillable weeks. Marketing matters last, but it matters: when a rule shrinks your billable capacity, intake volume and payer mix become the levers you still control.

A rule change is a volume problem

When a state shrinks who can bill or how often you can authorize, the levers you still control are intake volume and payer mix. We will look at where your families come from and what it would take to replace the capacity a rule change costs you.

No commitment. You will see the most impactful fixes first.